What are Pesticides: Its Effect On Foods And Your Health?

Many people worry about pesticides in foods.
Pesticides are used to reduce damage to crops from weeds, rodents, insects and germs. This increases the yield of fruits, vegetables and other crops.
This article focuses on pesticide residues, or the pesticides found on the surface of fruits and vegetables when they are purchased as groceries.
It explores the most common types of pesticides used in modern farming and whether their residues affect human health.

What Are Pesticides?

In the broadest sense, pesticides are chemicals used to control any organism that might invade or damage crops, food stores or homes.
Because there are many kinds of potential pests, there are several kinds of pesticides. The following are some examples:
  • Insecticides: Reduce destruction and contamination of growing and harvested crops by insects and their eggs.
  • Herbicides: Also known as weed killers, these improve crop yields.
  • Rodenticides: Important for controlling destruction and contamination of crops by vermin and rodent-borne diseases.
  • Fungicides: Especially important for protecting harvested crops and seeds from fungal rot.
Developments in agricultural practices, including pesticides, have increased crop yields in modern farming by two to eight times since the 1940s (1).
For many years, the use of pesticides was largely unregulated. However, the impact of pesticides on the environment and human health has been under greater scrutiny since the publication of Silent Spring by Rachel Carson in 1962.
Today, pesticides are under much greater scrutiny from governmental and non-governmental organizations.
The ideal pesticide would destroy its target pest without causing any adverse effects to humans, non-target plants, animals and the environment.
The most commonly used pesticides come close to that ideal standard. However, they are not perfect, and their use does have health and environmental effects.
SUMMARY:
Pesticides aim to destroy pests without negatively affecting humans and the environment. Pesticides have gotten better over time, but none are perfect at providing pest control without side effects.

Pesticides may be synthetic, meaning they're created in industrial labs, or organic.
Organic pesticides, or biopesticides, are naturally occurring chemicals, but they may be reproduced in labs for use in organic farming.

Synthetic Pesticides

Synthetic pesticides are designed to be stable, have a good shelf life and be easy to distribute.
They are also designed to be effective at targeting pests and have low toxicity to non-target animals and the environment.
Classes of synthetic pesticides include the following (2):
  • Organophosphates: Insecticides that target the nervous system. Several of them have been banned or restricted due to toxic accidental exposures.
  • Carbamates: Insecticides that affect the nervous system similarly to organophosphates, but they're less toxic, as their effects wear off more quickly.
  • Pyrethroids: Also affect the nervous system. They're a laboratory-produced version of a natural pesticide that's found in chrysanthemums.
  • Organochlorines: Including dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), these have been largely banned or restricted due to negative effects on the environment.
  • Neonicotinoids: Insecticides used on leaves and trees. They're currently under scrutiny by the US EPA for reports of unintended harm to bees.
  • Glyphosate: Known as a product called Roundup, this herbicide has become important in farming genetically modified crops.

Organic or Biopesticides

Organic farming makes use of biopesticides, or naturally occurring pesticide chemicals that have evolved in plants.
There are too many types to outline here, but the EPA has published a list of registered biopesticides.
Also, the US Department of Agriculture maintains a national list of approved synthetic and restricted organic pesticides.
Here are a few examples of important organic pesticides:
  • Rotenone: An insecticide used in combination with other organic pesticides. It's naturally produced as a beetle deterrent by several tropical plants and notoriously toxic to fish.
  • Copper sulfate: Destroys fungi and some weeds. Although it's classified as a biopesticide, it's industrially produced and can be toxic to humans and the environment at high levels.
  • Horticultural oils: Refers to oil extracts from various plants with anti-insect effects. These differ in their ingredients and potential side effects. Some can harm beneficial insects like bees (3).
  • Bt toxin: Produced by bacteria and effective against several kinds of insects, Bt toxin has been introduced into some types of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops.
This list is not comprehensive, but it illustrates two important concepts.
First, "organic" does not mean "pesticide-free." Rather, it refers to specialized kinds of pesticides that occur in nature and are used instead of synthetic pesticides.
Second, "natural" does not mean "non-toxic." Organic pesticides can also be harmful to your health and the environment.
SUMMARY:
Synthetic pesticides are created in labs. Organic or biopesticides are created in nature, but may be reproduced in labs. Although natural, these are not always safe for humans or the environment.
Multiple kinds of studies are used to understand what levels of pesticides are harmful.
Some examples include measuring levels in people who were accidentally exposed to too much pesticide, animal testing and studying the long-term health of people who use pesticides in their jobs.
This information is combined to create limits of safe exposures.
For example, the lowest dose of a pesticide causing even the most subtle symptom is called the "lowest observed adverse effect level," or LOAEL. The "no observed adverse effect level," or NOAEL, is also sometimes used (4).
Organizations like the World Health Organization, European Food Safety Authority, US Department of Agriculture and US Food and Drug Administration use this information to create a threshold for exposure that is considered safe.
To do this, they add an extra cushion of safety by setting thresholds 100–1,000 times lower than the LOAEL or NOAEL (4).
By being very cautious, regulatory requirements on pesticide use keep the amounts of pesticides on foods well below harmful levels.
SUMMARY:
Several regulatory organizations establish safety limits for pesticides in the food supply. These limits are very conservative, restricting pesticides to many times lower than the lowest dose known to cause harm.

One criticism of pesticide safety limits is that some pesticides — synthetic and organic — contain heavy metals like copper, which build up in the body over time.
However, a study of soil in India found that pesticide use did not result in higher levels of heavy metals than those found in pesticide-free soil (5).
Another criticism is that some of the more subtle, chronic health effects of pesticides may not be detectable by the types of studies used to establish safe limits.
For this reason, ongoing monitoring of health outcomes in groups with unusually high exposures is important to help refine regulations.
Violations of these safety thresholds are uncommon. A US study found pesticide levels above regulated thresholds in 9 out of 2,344 domestic and 26 out of 4,890 imported produce samples (6).
Furthermore, a European study found pesticide levels above their regulatory threshold in 4% of 40,600 foods across 17 countries (6).
Luckily, even when levels exceed regulatory thresholds, it rarely results in harm (67).
A review of decades of data in the US found outbreaks of illness resulting from pesticides in food were not caused by the routine use of pesticides, but rather rare accidents in which individual farmers applied a pesticide incorrectly (8).
SUMMARY:
Pesticide levels in produce rarely exceed safety thresholds and usually do not cause harm when they do. Most pesticide-related illness is the result of accidental overuse or occupational exposure.

Both synthetic and organic biopesticides have harmful health effects at doses higher than those typically found in fruits and vegetables.
In children, accidental exposures to high levels of pesticides are associated with childhood cancers, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism (910).
One study of 1,139 children found a 50–90% increased risk of ADHD in children with the highest urine levels of pesticides, compared to those with the lowest urine levels (1112).
In this study, it was unclear whether the pesticides detected in urine were from produce or other environmental exposures, such as living near a farm.
Another study showed no adverse health effects in 350 infants born to women with higher urine pesticide levels during pregnancy, compared to mothers with lower pesticide levels (13).
A study of organic pesticides used in gardening found that the use of rotenone was associated with Parkinson's disease later in life (14).
Both synthetic and organic biopesticides have been associated with increased cancer rates at higher levels in lab animals (15).
However, no increased cancer risk has been linked to the small amounts of pesticides in produce.
One review of many studies concluded that the odds of developing cancer from the amount of pesticides eaten in an average lifetime are less than one in a million (16).
SUMMARY:
Higher accidental or occupational pesticide exposure is associated with some cancers and neurodevelopmental diseases. However, the low levels of pesticides found in foods are unlikely to cause harm.
A comprehensive review of pesticides in food is available from the World Health Organization (17).
One study showed 3% of Polish apples contained pesticide levels above the legal safety limit for pesticides on food (18).
However, the levels were not high enough to cause harm, even in children.
The levels of pesticides on produce can be reduced by washing, cooking and food processing (19).
One review study found that pesticide levels were reduced by 10–80% by a variety of cooking and food processing methods (20).
In particular, washing with tap water (even without special soaps or detergents) reduces pesticide levels by 60–70% (21).
SUMMARY:
Pesticide levels in conventional produce are almost always below their safety limits. They can be reduced further by rinsing and cooking food.

Not surprisingly, organic produce has lower levels of synthetic pesticides. This translates into lower synthetic pesticide levels in the body (22).
One study in over 4,400 adults showed those reporting at least moderate use of organic produce had lower synthetic pesticide levels in their urine (23).
However, organic produce contains higher levels of biopesticides.
One study of olives and olive oils using organic pesticides found increased levels of the biopesticides rotenone, azadirachtin, pyrethrin and copper fungicides (24).
These organic pesticides also have negative environmental effects, which, in some cases, are worse than synthetic alternatives (25).
Some people argue that synthetic pesticides may be more harmful over time because they are designed to have a greater shelf life and may last longer in the body and environment.
This is sometimes true. Nevertheless, there are multiple examples of organic pesticides that persist as long or longer than the average synthetic pesticide (26).
An opposing viewpoint is that organic biopesticides are usually less effective than synthetic pesticides, causing farmers to use them more often and at higher doses.
In fact, in one study, while synthetic pesticides exceeded safety thresholds in 4% or less of produce, rotenone and copper levels were consistently above their safety limits (624).
Overall, the potential harm from synthetic and organic biopesticides depends on the specific pesticide and the dose. However, both types of pesticides are unlikely to cause health problems at the low levels found on produce.
SUMMARY:
Organic produce contains fewer synthetic pesticides, but more organic biopesticides. Biopesticides are not necessarily safer, but both types of pesticides are safe at the low levels found in produce.

GMOs are crops that have had genes added to them to enhance their growth, versatility or natural pest resistance (27).
Historically, wild plants were bred to have better characteristics for farming by selectively planting only the most ideal plants available.
This form of genetic selection has been used in every plant and animal in our world's food supply.
With breeding, changes are made gradually over many generations, and exactly why a plant becomes more resilient is a mystery. While a plant is selected for a certain trait, the genetic change that caused this trait is not visible to the breeders.
GMOs accelerate this process by using scientific techniques to give the target plant a specific genetic trait. The expected result is known in advance, as in the modification of corn to produce the insecticide Bt toxin (28).
Because GMO crops naturally have increased resistance, they require fewer pesticides for successful farming (29).
This probably doesn't benefit people eating produce, since the risk of pesticides on food is already extremely low. Yet, GMOs may reduce the harmful environmental and occupational health effects of both synthetic and organic biopesticides.
Multiple comprehensive reviews of both human and animal studies conclude there is no evidence that GMOs are harmful to health (29303132).
Some concern has been raised that GMOs that are resistant to glyphosate (Roundup)encourage the use of this herbicide in higher levels.
While one study suggested that high levels of glyphosate can promote cancer in lab animals, these levels were far higher than those consumed in GMO produce and even those of occupational or environmental exposures (33).
A review of multiple studies concluded realistic doses of glyphosate are safe (33).
SUMMARY:
GMOs require fewer pesticides. This reduces the risk of pesticide damage to farmers, harvesters and people living near farms. A large number of studies consistently demonstrate that GMOs are safe.

There is overwhelming scientific evidence that eating lots of fruits and vegetables has many, many health benefits (34).
This is true regardless of whether the produce is organic or conventionally grown and whether it's genetically modified or not (3536).
Some people may choose to avoid pesticides due to environmental or occupational health concerns. But keep in mind that organic does not mean pesticide-free.
Eating locally grown foods might have benefits for the environment, but it depends on the practices of the individual farm. If you shop at local farms, consider asking them about their pest control methods (26).
SUMMARY:
The low levels of pesticides found in produce are safe. Buying local produce may or may not reduce these risks, depending on individual farming practices.

Pesticides are used in almost all modern food production to improve crop yields by controlling weeds, insects and other threats to produce.
Both synthetic and organic biopesticides have potential health effects.
In general, synthetic pesticides are more strictly regulated and measured. Organic foods are lower in synthetic pesticides, but they're higher in organic biopesticides.
However, the levels of both synthetic pesticides and organic biopesticides in produce are many times below the lowest levels known to cause harm to animals or humans.
What's more, the many health benefits of eating more fruits and vegetables are very clear and consistent across hundreds of studies.
Use common sense habits, such as rinsing produce before use, but don't worry about pesticides in food

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Depression: Its Causes, effect and Treatment.

Tesla keeps promise with more affordable Model 3 with midrange battery pack